Sunday, September 30, 2007

Letterman on Paris

If you haven't seen this yet, it's definitely worth watching. If you have, it's definitely worth watching again. It is pure Letterman, the man at his absolute finest.




Tags:
* * * * * * * * * * *

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Letting the Wedding Photos Decide

The US presidential candidates are running all over the place, scratching and pawing at every possible kernel that could potentially burst open to reveal an opportunity to be heard or a chance to make some cash. Besides the fact that this time around each candidate has a Facebook page, a MySpace page and (yikes) a YouTube account, it pretty much is like it always is: career politicians at their finest, doing what they do best - campaigning. "I won't raise taxes, I won't go to war, I won't have sex with anyone but my spouse, I won't yadda yadda yadda." And they go about their gathering of resources and funding to build their voter bases and gain their party's nomination.

But that's not really working for me. I'm thinking about letting their wedding pictures decide for me. You can tell a lot about a person from his or her wedding picture. All right, 'nuff said, let's have a look:

First of all, Rudy Giuliani and Judith Nathan(1). Hmm. Tiara thingy? Yes, tiara thingy. That should be quite enough, but I'll add this: hers? or his? Let's move on.

Barack Obama and Michelle Robinson (2). I like this one, sort of. I mean, I like the fact that they hired not the best photographer in the world, who made them stand in front of a shiny pillar, which obviously caught the flash a bit. But then, why is she sitting down? What's that all about? Or is he standing on a box? Not liking that business. Maybe she's a dwarf? I don't know about this one.

Now on to John McCain and Cindy Hensley (3). She is absolutely stunning in this shot, he's looking pretty dapper himself. Oh, but then you see all that masonic temple-like stuff in the background and realize that they probably tied the knot in some chapel right behind the base commissary or something, with a bunch of white-panted guys with swords drawn. Arrgh.

And then there's (4) John Edwards and Elizabeth Anania. Hubba hubba. Despite the never appropriate ficus trees behind them and the "John whittled it in woodshop" cross, these two are super hot. Look at the eyes, look at the smiles. They seem to be actually in love as well. That's a plus. So far, it's these two, definitely.

Bill and Hill (5). First of all, when looking at any pictures of the Clintons in the early days, you can't help but wonder how much Bill didn't actually inhale and whether or not he didn't actually inhale because Hillary was bogarting the joint. That being said, the pic to the left is pretty darned sweet, but the one above is a little too slick for me. Bill's already having trouble keeping his hands to himself, and Hillary is already getting sick of him.

Now on to Mitt Romney and Ann Davies (6). This one is quite nice, actually. I like the eager look on his face, as they both gaze off into their future together. While certainly quite stunning, she does seem a bit concerned, however. It's either the "is the part in his hair always going to be perfect" look or the "ahh shit, here comes like 5 years of being pregnant" look. I can't tell which.

Moving right along, let's have a peek at Fred Thompson and his daughter (7). Hee hee. Ha ha. Ho ho. Seriously, the shot is too tabloid or something, too Hollywood somehow. And to think that just twenty years earlier, she was sitting on his knee telling him what she wanted for Christmas. Again, hee hee. Ha ha. Ho ho.

Oh, yeah, baby: Mike and Janet Huckabee (8). This is without a doubt one of the best in the bunch. It's like a Pink Floyd album cover, which should be enough in itself, but I read that he was very hungry during this photo shoot and so Janet's mom made him a burger, which he ate in between shots. That's simply adorable. And, hey - powder blue suit? You rock, Huckabee.

Dennis Kucinich and Elizabeth Jane Harper (9). This one could take hours. We not only have a bit of an age difference here (31 years), but there's the height thing as well. He's four feet three, she's twenty-seven feet, eleven inches. So you understand why she's sitting down AND he's standing on a horse to make this picture work. And here we go again with a tiara thingy. I think that women who wear tiara-thingies at their weddings should be forced to carry a magic wand as well. They look happy enough, I guess, but it's going to last through the campaign and that's about it, unfortunately for the (knew each other for two weeks before they decided to get hitched) lovebirds.

This one is just too good to be true. Here are Ron Paul and Carol Wells (10), making their way through showers of rice as they head out of the church. This one could not have been planned any better and has all the makings of a Hollywood love story. Me like.

And here's Tommy Thompson and Sue Ann Mashak (11). I love the Elk's Lodge fireplace, love the bizarre wall decoration, and love her outfit. But that's it. He's managed to not quite tuck the speech that he'll be giving in about 5 minutes all the way down into his pocket and certainly couldn't be bothered to rent a suit or tux, opting instead to simply pin a carnation to the one he wore at the office all day. No, he's not the guy, which is no big deal since nobody really knows that he's running.

And last, but not least, Mike Gravel and Whitney Stewart (12). I like this one, but I don't really know why. It's not even a good picture. They both look genuinely happy, I guess is why. No foof, no goof, just a happy couple, that's all.

The 6 or 7 (8? 9?) other candidates in the running have not had any embarrassing wedding photos leaked into Cyberspace yet, so I could not dig anything up.

So who gets the vote? Hard to pick just one happy couple at this point, so I'll give you my top three presidential candidates, based entirely on their wedding pix: Mike Huckabee, John Edwards and Ron Paul, with Mike Gravel (who apparently calls himself Gruh-VELL, in order to differentiate himself from those extremely unpopular and annoying small rocks) pulling in an honorable mention.

Wow. That was MUCH easier than actually having to listen to them.

Tags:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

35

Last night I came across the following amazing facts about the number 35. Did I say amazing? Good, because I meant it.

California resident Guy "Bud" Hart (I love the fact that his name is Guy, but for unknown reasons his friends save time and call him Bud) coughed up a nail that had been inside of him for 35 years.

Some guy (apparently... or not) took a picture of Tokyo every day for 35 years from the same spot and it is now a ten second film.

35 years of original Sesame Street music is available here.

In June of this year, tribunal judges sentenced Milan Martić, a former political leader of Croatian Serbs, to 35 years' imprisonment for crimes committed during the early nineties against Croats and other non-Serbs in Croatia.

Interstate 35 is a US highway that runs from Texas to Minnesota.

35 is the highest number one can count to on one's fingers using base 6.

The 35th wedding anniversary is the Coral Wedding Anniversary. Lovely.

You must be 35 years old to run for the office of the President of the United States. Fair to say that only Obama needs to be carded this go around.

In 1972, 35 years ago, HP introduced the world’s first scientific pocket calculator – the HP-35 – and delivered portable “computing power” into the hands of users.

35 years is approximately 1,104,471,969 seconds.

Lions and deer can live to be 35 years old. 36 is therefore probably also attainable.

One of the founding members of the Wu-Tang Clan (oh, right ... them), rapper Ol' Dirty Bastard, ODB to his peeps, was 35 when he collapsed and died in his New York studio in 2004. He was two days away from his 36th birthday.

Andy Kaufman faked his own death at the age of 35. He will be back soon. I just know it.

Kelly Bundy is now 35 years old. And probably still living with her parents.


And 35 years ago today, my mother gave birth to a bouncing baby me. Still bouncing. Thanks, mom.

Tags:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Monday, September 24, 2007

Clowning around with American lives

One of the main reasons that I am still in Sweden has to do with health insurance. I did not really plan to move here permanently when I began working at the Icehotel in November of 2000. But shortly after meeting Sanna, she was diagnosed with Lupus and began treatment here in Sweden. Sweden's medical care is not only pretty damn good, but it is affordable. Every citizen and resident has the right to be seen and treated, and costs for prescriptions and care are minimal, if anything. (The taxes we pay make this possible, of course.)

Before her diagnosis, we spoke often about the possibility of moving back to California. But making that move and starting over, without health insurance and with an existing chronic disease, would be a definite crap shoot. And expensive.

Trying to explain this amazing phenomenon to non-Americans is extremely difficult. They don't really get the fact that just being a citizen does not mean that you will receive the medical attention that you need or deserve. I happened to watch the first episode of Scrubs last night and didn't even laugh when Dr. Kelso said to J.D., "If they have insurance, treat them. If they don't have insurance, send them away" or something like that. Americans don't find that joke funny. It is simply the truth.

So I find it incredibly disturbing to see that once again George W and (who's left of) his homeys, can't seem to find the decency to pass a bill that would provide an additional 4 million American children with health insurance. Not dogs, not terrorists, not Iraqis ... no. American children. This man is such an idiot that this decision doesn't shock me, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't hurt.

Bush has said that the measure is too expensive and would unnecessarily raise taxes for the American people. The dolt is too mathematically inept to realize that his back-asswards war in Iraq is costing taxpayers already and will continue to do for many years to come. Bush seems to be all too ready to spend taxpayer money on something that they don't want, i.e., an unjustified grudge match of a war, and less than interested in using tax dollars to pay for something that they do want, i.e., health insurance.

When browsing Fred Thompson's website the other day (don't ask), I found a video of Thompson pontificating about Hillary Clinton's proposed health care plan. Rubbing his chin and smirking as he does, eyes twinkling like the Grinch, he mentioned that the United States has the "best health care in the world." That is sort of like saying that a Ferrari is the best car in the world. Hell, I don't know, maybe a Ferrari is the best car in the world. But those who can't afford the insurance to drive it off the lot will never know. Mr. Thompson can apparently afford to drive the Ferrari.

The ongoing Republican argument is that US health care needs to remain privatized, and that the government should stay as far away as possible. In a Utopian society, this is a great idea. But it doesn't work in reality. As of a 2005 survey, there are roughly 47 million Americans without health care. That's a lot o' peeps. Like 15% of the population. But keep in mind that this doesn't include the under-insured numbers. Going back to the Ferrari analogy, these numbers can of course be turned around to work in Bush's favor. To be able to say that 85% of the American people have some sort of Ferrari in the garage is no doubt enough to make Bush and Thompson high five on their way to the clubhouse, despite the fact that the quality of each Ferrari differs dramatically from garage to garage.

The best health care I've ever had? A general practitioner in Thailand. Cost about 20 bucks for a full a visit AND the medications necessary to treat a nasty rash I had on my legs. The doctor was super friendly, spoke perfect English (educated in the States, of course) and was extremely knowledgeable and capable.

The worst health care I've ever experienced? A dentist in Beverly Hills, California. Dr. Farrakhan (that is not his name and he in no way resembled any particular Farrakhan - I do not know why my colleagues and I called him that) had so many unnecessary gadgets in his posh BH office that I thought I had accidentally stumbled into a Sharper Image store. The first thing he decided to do with me was throw a camera in my mouth and take a close-up of each tooth. Each tooth. After many follow up visits (and I have never had a cavity in my life, so I don't know what these return visits were all about) I finally got a bill from my insurance company for 32 images of my teeth. Turns out my PPO was the primer-sprayed, cracked-windshield model Ferrari. After negotiating the bill way down, I never went back to Dr. Farrakhan again.

Anyhow, it is irrational and irresponsible to say that the current privatized health care system in the US is working. Call me crazy. (Okay: Crazy.) Does that mean that the government needs to step in and do something about it? Yeah, that's exactly what it means, Mr. Thompson... Mr. Bush. Does that mean that taxes need to be raised to cover the costs? Well, considering the payoff, I don't think people would get too freaked out about it. People might be more interested in paying taxes that contribute to saving lives than paying taxes that contribute to taking them away. And since taxes will more than likely be going up over the next ten years to try to make up the deficit that the Bush administration has succeeded in ballooning, why not go head and tack on a little more for something worthwhile: the well-being of a few kids. Just sneak it in there, Congress. You can be sneaky - you're politicians, after all.

I leave you with this last photo. A tiny bit off-topic, but oh well. It's Monday.



Tags:
* * * * * * * * href="http://technorati.com/tag/republican" rel="tag">republican * * * * * * * * * * * *

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Sliding Doberman

I wish I was a dog. This dog:


Cooking with Anders

I don't give a very thorough explanation of what I'm actually doing, but benzone50 has done a great job of slicing together an episode of me in the kitchen preparing, of all things, duck. Go figure. Enjoy...




Tags:
* * * * * * * * * * *

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

How YOU get good duck

This is a story about how an idea becomes a blog entry...

First the idea just sort of hovers in the background: present, but still vague and fuzzy.

Then the idea is put on hold completely while much pondering occurs. In this particular instance, the pondering involved repetitive occurrences of the phrase "the &#*?/&% boat is filled with water" and other such loveliness.

By the time the boat is no longer filled with water, the idea has gone for a swim.

But the idea makes its way back, and finally lets itself be heard.

Once the boat has reached the other side of the lake, the idea heads back home.

Once home, the idea is converted into on-screen text and binary codes and bleeps and dots and ... stuff.

Once properly formatted, the idea starts its journey to the server that will be its host and home.

'Tis a long and perilous journey, with many obstacles and hindrances.

The idea is forced into many awkward situations along the way. Flight is one of them.

Another is extreme shrinkage.

When tired, the idea finds a rest stop and rests... for 1/1,000,000 of a second.

And then moves on.

Making its way out into the world again, the idea goes underground for a bit. The specifics of what happens at this point are not clear and have never been documented. All we know is that just an hour or so after inception, and after a journey of eleventy billion light years, the end result is this:

Now that's a freakin' trip.


Monday, September 17, 2007

Hanging on...


Tailer's debut music video for some free song by a guy named something or whatever on slide.com. Click on the speaker to hear it.

Clock ticking for Tuvalu

Last night I watched a very well-done documentary on Swedish television called Trouble in Paradise, by Gilliane Le Gallic and Christopher Horner. In this colorful piece, the filmmakers discuss the notion that the island nation of Tuvalu may simply disappear within the next 50 years.

Tuvalu? What's a Tuvalu? Formerly known as the Ellice Islands, Tuvalu is a group of islands east of Australia, about 1000 km north of Fiji. It is the second-least populated country in the world, with just under 12,000 people. The group of nine islands has almost no natural resources, most of its income coming from foreign aid. Any sustainable farming that they were once able to practice has been pretty much wiped out by the various effects of global warming.

Tuvalu's lowest point and highest point are sea level and 30 feet respectively. 30 feet! That's nothing. And with ocean levels rising as they are, that nine meters is shrinking every year.

With an average per capita income of $1,600/year, the country is quite poor and in no position to take the saving of their nation into their own hands. It is remarkable that the same world in which Google and the X Prize Foundation offer up a 30 million dollar prize to the first person/group that successfully sends an unmanned space craft to the moon is the same world that can just sit back and let a nation (albeit a tiny one) sink into the sea. (I imagine that if there was oil under Tuvalu, we'd be doing something about it, i.e. bombing it to take it over. But Tuvalu does not have rich oil reserves, so they are not even a blip on the radar screen.) I guess the argument can be made that if this Google stuff and the Virgin Galactic stuff works out, we can just send Tuvalu to the moon. But after seeing this documentary last night, I think the moon is the last place they want to be.

What struck me most about this documentary was not so much that it is happening and the world is not doing a whole hell of a lot about it. There's nothing new there. No, what struck me most was the attitude, charm and charisma of the people. They are a beautiful, intelligent, well-meaning bunch of people, who love their simple lives and just want to keep them.

Here is a link to a portion (14 min) of the film. It's worth seeing the whole thing, so if you do run across it on the tee-vee, make sure you sit down and watch it. You can also order a copy of the DVD here.


Tags:
* * * * * * * *

The Juice, once again, didn't do it.

"You've got to understand, this ain't somebody going to steal somebody's drugs or something like that. This is somebody going to get his private (belongings) back. That's not robbery," Simpson told the Los Angeles Times.

Merriam-Webster's Distionary of Law
says:
Main Entry: rob·bery
Function: noun
Inflected Form: plural -ber·ies
Etymology: Anglo-French robberie roberie, from Old French, from rober to take something away from a person by force; the unlawful taking away of personal property from a person by violence or by threat of violence that causes fear : larceny from the person or immediate presence of another by violence or threat of violence and with intent to steal.

Says nothing here about being okay if you once owned the personal property being stolen. Says nothing here about being all right to take stuff that once belonged to Joe Montana.

OJ Simpson, ladies and gentlemen: Mental midget, murderer, general idiot.


Tags:
* * * * * * *

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Did You Know 2.0

The video below has been viewed by well over 5,000,000 people in the past year, but I was not one of them until today. So if you've already seen it, skip it. Otherwise, watch it. And you can read more about it here.

I have worked as a teacher off and on and just a few years ago I came to the conclusion that, for the most part, kids think school is pretty stupid. And this video helps to point out why. What kids are doing at home in front of their computer screens makes it a bit tricky to go to school the next day and trace your hand to make a turkey or write an essay on Abraham Lincoln.

"Yeah but, how many Facebook friends did Abraham Lincoln have? Could he write HTML? Did he take part in the YouTube debates?"


Exactly. Kids know what's going on and it doesn't involve the hand turkey.



Tags:
* * * * * * * * *

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Petraeus: Another Tool with Charts and Graphs

Look at those guys. Inner dialogue here? How about: You gonna say it? I'm not gonna say it. You promise you're not gonna say it? Pinky promise? Pinky promise.

General David Petraeus and Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker testified before Congress yesterday on the progress of the Bush surge, and to nobody's surprise, the general said that things are just hunky dory over there. "We can take 'em, coach. I just need some more time, that's all." Or something like that. Yadda yadda yadda. Bush couldn't have said it better himself.

Thankfully, Petraeus brought charts and graphs with him. Because the American people LOVE charts and graphs. In fact, if I remember correctly, Colin Powell presented some lovely charts and PowerPoint images, oh, way back when, which sort of got us in to this whole mess in the first place. Those charts and graphs turned out to be less than... what's the word... oh yeah: reliable.

So what's Powell doing these days, by the way? He's lecturing. And advising. Oh yeah, and apologizing. In an interview with Walter Isaacson for GQ Magazine, which is definitely worth a read, Powell is relaxed, candid, and once again: brilliant. How he ever got mixed up with these good ol' boys in the first place is beyond me. Here's an excerpt from the interview, when the topic of charts and graphs came up:

Isaacson: Do you feel responsible for giving the U.N. flawed intelligence?

Powell: I didn’t know it was flawed. Everybody was using it. The CIA was saying the same thing for two years. I gave perhaps the most accurate presentation of the intelligence as we knew it—without any of the “Mushroom clouds are going to show up tomorrow morning” and all the rest of that stuff. But the fact of the matter is that a good part of it was wrong, and I am sorry that it was wrong.

Ahhh, the power of charts and graphs. Remind me to put together some charts and graphs to prove to the American people why the current administration sucks. In fact, I hope that the organizers of this upcoming weekend's March on Washington remember the charts and graphs. Mass protest seems to gather a lot of attention, but with charts and graphs in hand, too? Woo hoo, who's yer daddy now, eh?

If you haven't already, read the Powell interview and pass it on. He is a good man, a smart man, a reasonable man. (And a hottie at 70. I mean, look at that shot by Martin Schoeller above.) While Petraeus might be all of those things as well, okay minus the hottie bit, we won't know for sure until he gives the same interview in five or ten years. His leash is a little too tight right now for him to be able to actually speak his mind.

I've cut and pasted a couple more little short excerpts below. Enjoy.

Isaacson: Your hero General George Marshall, when he was secretary of state, oversaw the creation of amazing new institutions and doctrines—NATO, the Marshall Plan—to deal with the global threat posed by Soviet Communism. Now that we’re faced with new global threats, what type of creative responses would he and his wise men be devising?

Powell: To some extent, he faced a more dangerous threat, and it was an easier one to work with. There was one identifiable enemy that was on the other side of an identifiable terrain feature. It was state versus state. They were able to put in place state-based structures.

Isaacson: Isn’t the new global threat we face even more dangerous?

Powell: What is the greatest threat facing us now? People will say it’s terrorism. But are there any terrorists in the world who can change the American way of life or our political system? No. Can they knock down a building? Yes. Can they kill somebody? Yes. But can they change us? No. Only we can change ourselves. So what is the great threat we are facing?

I would approach this differently, in almost Marshall-like terms. What are the great opportunities out there—ones that we can take advantage of? It should not be just about creating alliances to deal with a guy in a cave in Pakistan. It should be about how do we create institutions that keep the world moving down a path of wealth creation, of increasing respect for human rights, creating democratic institutions, and increasing the efficiency and power of market economies? This is perhaps the most effective way to go after terrorists.

...

Isaacson: How can we restore America’s image?

Powell: We should remember what that image was, back after World War II. It was the image of a generous country that sought not to impose its will on other countries or even to impose its values. But it showed the way, and it helped other countries, and it opened its doors to people—visitors and refugees and immigrants.

America could not survive without immigration. Even the undocumented immigrants are contributing to our economy. That’s the country my parents came to. That’s the image we have to portray to the rest of the world: kind, generous, a nation of nations, touched by every nation, and we touch every nation in return. That’s what people still want to believe about us. They still want to come here. We’ve lost a bit of the image, but we haven’t lost the reality yet. And we can fix the image by reflecting a welcoming attitude—and by not taking counsel of our fears and scaring ourselves to death that everybody coming in is going to blow up something. It ain’t the case.



Tags:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Monday, September 10, 2007

Britney Spears and the Amazing Head of Hair

It seems that I've been avoiding the serious stuff for a while now, playing around with the silly politicians and such. I apologize and now return to the thoughts that really matter: Britney's hair follicles.
So the child prodigy-turned-standard-Hollywood-idiot apparently gave a rather lackluster performance at last night's Video Music Awards awards in Las Vegas. So what? I mean, whatever. Like, fer shure, or something. I have not seen the performance as of right this very second, nor will I have seen it when you ask me tomorrow. I do not believe that I would be quite able to tell the difference between a bad Britney Spears performance and a good one.

So when I saw that very important headline pop up on my Google home page, I thought to myself, hmmm, does she have hair? The last bit of Britney Spears news that I followed closely (for about 40 minutes I think) was the little head shaving incident (because it was unbelievably fascinating) and that was in February.

Anyhow, I clicked right along until I came to this image of Britney buying some purses, because that is what she does, and it does indeed appear that she has hair. BUT, she's got one of those headband thingies up there, so any extensions might just be attached under that. I stared at this image for about a minute and all I came up with is, "Mmmm. Leather upholstery."

And then I found this image of Britney hanging out in Vegas with her homey Puffy D Diddy-o, or whatever his name is. AHA! Headband thingy!

So then I whipped back to the VMA performance shot to see if she had one of those little headband thingies. NOPE. No headband thingy. So what's the deal? How does that work? I checked with howstuffworks.com and they tell me that the maximum, yes the MAXIMUM, rate for hair growth is about 6 inches (15 cm) per year. So then I counted the months between February and September on my fingers (it's always easiest to count months on your fingers) and I got nowhere near a year. Yet the picture from the VMA shows no headband thingy and at least 12 inches of hair. AT LEAST 12! Look again:
I think that there is some sort of cover up going on and think that we should impeach Ms. Spears immediately before she shaves or grows anything else. What kind of mother does she think she is? Having hair and then not having hair and then... having hair again.

This is all too much.

I need a cocktail.


Tags:
* * * * * * * * * * * *

Sunday, September 09, 2007

Another one bites the dust

Another Republican, Chuck Hagel, has announced that he, too, plans to get the hell out of Dodge, and who can blame him. Though I think that it is sad to see this one go, since he is rightfully critical of the war in Iraq.

Hagel also states that he will not be making a run for the presidency in 2008, which is appropriate. You can see in the image above that he is wearing a Band-Aid on his left thumb, which means that he bleeds, and is therefore human. An actual human being in the White House would be a major setback.

Honestly, why would anybody in their right mind want to get in the White House right now? The incredible mess that the current administration has created is going to make for at least 8 years of major overhaul and cleanup. To have to take over, pull out of Iraq, replenish the non-existent budget, repair the global image of the US, and apologize for the past 8 years WHILE trying to fix the Social Security and health care systems in the US? That's a job I'd not want to have.

But thanks for the offer.


Tags:
* * * * * * * * * * * *

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Good Question

The kids just want to know if grandpa can hold out or not... He would be the oldest president ever elected, IF elected.




"Thanks for the question, you little jerk," McCain joked back to one student who asked the 71-year-old if he was afraid about dying in office or of getting Alzheimer's disease. "You're drafted."

He made a funny.

Tags:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Bush using Nixon speeches for inspiration

The White House has released a statement in which Bush and his speech writers admit to pouring through old Nixon speeches in order to borrow material and, as the President put it, "verbalismation...isms" to be used in upcoming Bush speeches.

This Nixon speech here, for example, is one that the Bush team has already crafted and readied for use. When Bush delivers the speech, in oh, say, about 6 months, only a few changes will have been made, including replacing the word "jews" with "muslims", the word "blacks" with "liberals" the word "Vietnam" with "Iraq", and the word "Cambodia" with "Afghanistan".

Please note that Mr. Nixon's symphonic, proliferating use of the "F" word may not make this piece suitable for playing at the office.

Enjoy.

Tags:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Monday, September 03, 2007

Major League Starving

This morning I ran across an article on CNN.com about the new buffalo wing-eating champion in the US, Sonya Thomas, aka "The Black Widow", and I almost lost my lunch. Breakfast. Whatever. This very flattering AP photo accompanies the article. Nice.

I have never seen a competitive eating competition. It is not on my list of things to do before I die. Nor will it ever reach that status. I have seen a few sloppy seconds of highlight footage, and that's it. I am sure that you know the kind - a closeup of a contestant pushing in the unwilling end of a hot dog only to have it pop back out again, bringing with it spray of spittle and a dribbling drizzle of drool. The contestant, beads of sweat dancing crazily on his or her forehead, eyes darting nervously back and forth, crudely places a finger, or maybe this time a finger and a thumb, on the end of the runaway dog, and forces it back in again. Hand #2 is ready with the next dog, and the untidy cycle continues.

This guy, who boasts the very witty name of Cookie Jarvis, is one of the, and I am quoting his website here, "most recognized eaters in the world." Cookie can eat 21 cannoli in just six minutes and a large 17 inch pizza in just three minutes. 'Atta boy, Cookie Monster. If I do the math correctly, that means that five starving humans in Sudan could live off of Cookie for about a year.

Whether boiled, fried, roasted or dipped in BBQ sauce and then grilled... Cookie would be a delicious treat (look at that flavorful tummy, mmmm...) for some people who would die (and are) for just one cannoli and a slice of pizza.

I did not realize that people are actually starting to get paid for eating as much as they can in a short period of time, but, sadly, 'tis true. What an amazing world we live in. That there is a need, let alone an audience, for this type of thing is unbelievable. That there is an organization called MLE, yes - Major League Eating, is insulting and disgusting. That Tom Stoddart's shocking images of famine in Sudan:can co-exist in a world where images like this also live:is utterly amazing.

I'll leave you with a few more images to brighten up your day.

And remember: you are what you... yeah, right, you get it.



Tags:
* * * * * * * * * * *
* *